Unseen Eyes: Are Rental Properties Compromising Your Privacy?

U.S. Capitol building with clear blue sky background.

In response to growing concerns about hidden surveillance in rental properties, Rep. Nancy Mace will chair a congressional hearing examining how modern technology threatens privacy in private spaces, with particular focus on protecting women from voyeurism.

Key Insights

  • Rep. Nancy Mace, a voyeurism survivor herself, will lead a congressional hearing on surveillance technologies in private spaces on May 20, 2024.
  • The hearing will examine how rental and vacation properties may use surveillance technology that threatens personal privacy and security.
  • Expert witnesses from travel technology, security, and privacy sectors will testify on potential solutions.
  • The hearing aims to develop accountability frameworks and industry collaboration to protect individuals from covert surveillance.

Congressional Hearing to Address Hidden Surveillance Concerns

The House Subcommittee on Cybersecurity, Information Technology, and Government Innovation will hold a critical hearing titled “Breach of Trust: Surveillance in Private Spaces” next week. Chairwoman Nancy Mace (R-S.C.) announced the hearing will examine the growing availability and sophistication of surveillance technology, specifically addressing risks to personal privacy and security in rental and vacation properties. The session marks an important step in confronting technology that can be misused to violate privacy rights in spaces where people expect to be safe from observation.

Personal Experience Driving Policy Examination

Representative Mace brings personal insight to this issue as a survivor of voyeurism. She has emphasized that being secretly recorded represents a serious violation of human rights, especially for women who are disproportionately targeted. The hearing aims to explore how modern surveillance technologies, which have become more affordable and sophisticated, create new opportunities for privacy violations in rental accommodations. The subcommittee will address how these technologies can be misused in settings where people have a reasonable expectation of privacy.

Expert Testimony and Industry Collaboration

The hearing will feature testimony from three key witnesses representing different aspects of the issue. Laura Chadwick, President and CEO of The Travel Technology Association, will likely address how the travel and rental industry views these concerns. Joseph LaSorsa, security expert and Founder of LaSorsa and Associates, will provide insights on surveillance technology capabilities and vulnerabilities. Alan Butler, Executive Director of the Electronic Privacy Information Center, brings expertise on privacy legislation and protections that could address these issues.

Seeking Practical Solutions and Accountability

The hearing seeks to develop practical solutions to protect privacy in rental accommodations. Rather than simply highlighting problems, the subcommittee aims to explore collaboration opportunities with technology companies and property rental platforms to establish stronger privacy safeguards and accountability mechanisms. This includes examining existing industry standards and identifying gaps in current protections that leave consumers vulnerable to privacy violations when staying in unfamiliar accommodations.

Public Awareness and Participation

The hearing is scheduled for Tuesday, May 20, 2024, at 2:00 PM ET in room 2247 of the Rayburn House Office Building. For those unable to attend in person, the proceedings will be available via livestream, increasing public awareness of these important privacy concerns. The subcommittee appears focused on developing concrete recommendations rather than merely highlighting problems, signaling a step toward more comprehensive privacy protections for Americans who increasingly rely on rental properties for business and leisure travel.

Sources:

  1. RepNancyMace
  2. House Hearing to Focus on Surveillance in ‘Private Spaces’, (May 14, 2025)
  3. Mace to Hold Hearing on the Misuse of Surveillance Technologies in Private Spaces