
Democratic heavy hitters, in a rare display of bipartisanship, unite behind President Trump’s economic proposal to cease minting pennies due to financial inefficiency.
Key Insights
- Bipartisan support emerges for Trump’s plan to stop penny production due to cost concerns.
- Producing a penny costs more than its face value, resulting in significant financial losses.
- Lawmakers and governors emphasize environmental and taxpayer benefits from halting penny minting.
- Trump’s directive to the U.S. Treasury highlights a commitment to reducing government waste.
Bipartisan Support for Ending Penny Production
Both Republicans and Democrats have aligned themselves with President Donald Trump’s decision to end the production of pennies. Announced through Truth Social, Trump cited the fact that minting each penny costs over two cents, leading to significant economic loss. Representatives from both parties agree that the move addresses financial inefficiencies, with Rep. Jared Moskowitz describing it as potentially Trump’s “best” first month decision.
The U.S. Mint reported a loss exceeding $85 million from penny production in 2024 alone. For nearly two decades, the cost to produce coins such as pennies and nickels has exceeded their face value. While eliminating the penny may seem like a small step, lawmakers such as Rep. Jamie Raskin assert that these measures are necessary for addressing budgetary waste.
Economic and Environmental Rationale
Colorado Governor Jared Polis pointed out the environmental benefits accompanying Trump’s decision, in addition to taxpayer savings. With zinc, a major component of pennies, possessing considerable mining value, cutting its usage could reduce pollution. Waste reduction through such initiatives is in line with a broader fiscal responsibility agenda being advocated by members of Congress. Sen. Jacky Rosen emphasized this as a “common sense move” aligning with taxpayer interests.
In the words of Donald Trump, “For far too long, the United States has minted pennies which literally cost us more than 2 cents. This is so wasteful! I have instructed my Secretary of the US Treasury to stop producing new pennies.”
The initiative has received praise not only from political bodies but also from economic analysts such as Craig Agranoff, who supports its economic efficiency. Previous proposals for penny elimination didn’t achieve legislative clarity, but the current bipartisan momentum hints at potential enactment into law. However, there’s still discussion over business implications, particularly concerning changes in transaction taxation.
Beyond Fiscal Measures
This movement away from penny production extends across multiple dimensions of government oversight. Apart from efforts aimed at national budgetary reform, Trump has recently adopted directives spanning policy sectors like immigration and diversity. Moreover, in a continually growing pursuit of efficiency, Elon Musk has been entrusted with heading the Department of Government Efficiency.
While the operational logistics of phasing out the penny unravel, the overarching call for government spending cuts continues. Rep. Ben Cline commented how every penny saved represents wins for taxpayers, aligning with long-term financial objectives. Transcending monetary symbolism, these developments hint at an evolving landscape for policy enactment amidst unified political fronts.
Sources:
- ‘Makes sense’: GOP, Dems unite behind Trump’s plan to fire the penny
- Democrat senator backs Trump’s ‘common sense move’ to fire the penny
- Democratic Governor Praises Trump’s ‘Great’ Penny Decision