U.S. Withdraws From Several Key UN Organizations

Illuminated exit sign with arrow pointing left.

President Trump announced a strategic withdrawal of the U.S. from several key United Nations organizations, triggering a reassessment of America’s international commitments.

Key Insights

President Trump confirmed the U.S. withdrawal from the U.N. Human Rights Council.
The exit is part of a broader evaluation of U.S. involvement in international organizations.
Funding to UNRWA has been discontinued amid allegations of bias and inefficiencies.
A critical review of UNESCO and U.N. funding was ordered.

Presidential Order Targets UN Organizations

President Donald Trump has issued a presidential order directing the United States to withdraw from the U.N. Human Rights Council and halt financial contributions to UNRWA, the agency aiding Palestinian refugees. The decision stems from concerns about inefficiencies and activities within these organizations that may conflict with American values and interests. This order also includes a call for a thorough assessment of U.S. participation in UNESCO.

During a meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, President Trump highlighted perceived biases within the U.N. Human Rights Council and UNRWA against Israel. Netanyahu has long criticized these U.N. bodies for their stance towards Israel. The American move reflects a significant stride in realigning international relations based on national interests and fiscal prudence.

Today, @POTUS signed an Executive Order withdrawing the United States from the UN Human Rights Council (UNHRC) and prohibiting any future funding for the UN Relief and Works Agency for the Near East (UNRWA). The Executive Order also requires the Secretary of State to review and…

— Department of State (@StateDept) February 5, 2025

Impact on U.S. Budget and Global Positioning

The U.S., contributing 22% of the U.N.’s regular budget, is its largest financier. China’s position as the second-largest contributor underscores the international dynamics at play. Trump’s administration seeks to recalibrate these financial commitments, emphasizing the need for greater fairness in funding practices and support aligned with U.S. policies. Taking this step could also redefine the U.S.’s role on the global stage.

I’ve always felt that the U.N. has tremendous potential. It’s not living up to that potential right now. … They’ve got to get their act together. – Donald Trump Source

In alignment with the U.S. government’s strategic repositioning, a comprehensive review of all international agreements and memberships will be conducted. This effort is designed to ensure that all such ties continue to serve national interests effectively. A White House official confirmed the urgency of this review, underscoring the first steps in strengthening domestic focus and recalibrating global alliances.

U.N. Agencies’ Roles and Responses

UNRWA was established in 1949 following the displacement of Palestinians during the 1948 Arab-Israeli conflict. The agency operates educational and health services in Gaza and surrounding regions. In light of recent accusations of fund misuse and connections to militant activities, which UNRWA denies, several governments froze their contributions, though the U.S. has proceeded to make this cut permanent.

President Biden’s past administration had restarted financial support to UNRWA, citing humanitarian concerns. However, this new pivot reflects ongoing concerns about accountability and alignment with U.S. policies. The White House’s definitive action underscores an evolving American foreign policy stance that prioritizes national interest.