
President Donald Trump signs an executive order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization, sparking global concern and debate.
Key Insights
- Trump’s executive order marks his second attempt to withdraw the US from WHO in less than five years.
- The decision has been met with criticism from public health experts, warning of potential negative impacts on global health efforts.
- WHO expresses regret over the announcement and urges the US to reconsider, emphasizing their long-standing partnership.
- The withdrawal could significantly impact WHO’s funding and ability to respond to future health crises.
- Debate ensues over the legality and process of unilateral withdrawal without Congressional approval.
Trump’s Executive Order and Its Implications
President Donald Trump has once again set the stage for a significant shift in US foreign policy by signing an executive order to withdraw the United States from the World Health Organization (WHO). This move, which represents Trump’s second attempt to sever ties with the global health body, has ignited a firestorm of debate and concern within the international community.
The executive order criticizes the WHO for demanding disproportionate payments from the US, which has been the largest funder of the organization, contributing almost one-fifth of its $6.8 billion budget in 2023. Trump’s decision to withdraw reflects his administration’s longstanding criticism of several global institutions and its “America First” policy stance.
Global Health Community Reacts
The announcement has sent shockwaves through the global health community, with many experts expressing grave concerns about the potential consequences of this decision. Public health professionals warn that the withdrawal could severely impact global health efforts and diminish US leadership in health and science.
The WHO itself has responded with a mix of regret and hope. In an official statement, the organization emphasized its crucial role in global health and security, including for Americans, by addressing disease causes, strengthening health systems, and managing health emergencies. The WHO also highlighted its long-standing partnership with the US, pointing out their collaborative achievements over the past 70 years, such as the eradication of smallpox and near-eradication of polio.
WHO comments on United States announcement of intent to withdraw
The World Health Organization regrets the announcement that the United States of America intends to withdraw from the Organization.
WHO plays a crucial role in protecting the health and security of the world’s… pic.twitter.com/DT3QJ49bhb
— World Health Organization (WHO) (@WHO) January 21, 2025
Financial and Operational Implications
The withdrawal will pause US funding to the WHO, exacerbating its already strained financial situation. This comes at a particularly challenging time, as the organization recently issued an emergency funding appeal for $1.5 billion. Dr. David Hamer, a global health expert, warns that the reduced capacity of WHO could slow responses to future health crises, potentially affecting the US as well.
The financial impact extends beyond the WHO itself. Lawrence Gostin, a legal expert, cautions that the withdrawal could lead to reduced global health funding, affecting critical programs for HIV, polio, and health emergencies. This potential domino effect underscores the far-reaching consequences of Trump’s decision.
“It’s a cataclysmic presidential decision. Withdrawal is a grievous wound to world health, but a still deeper wound to the US” – Lawrence Gostin
Legal and Political Challenges
The legality of Trump’s executive order has come under scrutiny. Gostin argues that the order is legally flawed, noting that it violates the one-year notice period and financial obligations mandated by Congress. Furthermore, there is ongoing debate about whether Trump can unilaterally withdraw the US from WHO without Congressional approval.
However, with Republicans controlling Congress, the process may be facilitated if it aligns with their policy objectives. Some supporters of Trump have celebrated the withdrawal, viewing the WHO as a problematic organization that requires reform or disengagement.
As the situation unfolds, the WHO remains hopeful that the United States will reconsider its decision. The organization has expressed openness to constructive dialogue to maintain their partnership for the benefit of global health. The coming months will likely see intense diplomatic efforts and political maneuvering as the international community grapples with the potential fallout of this momentous decision.
Sources:
- US exit from WHO could see fifth of budget disappear
- What will happen to World Health Organization without US funding?
- WHO comments on United States’ announcement of intent to withdraw
- WHO Responds to Trump Withdrawing US From Organization