Kamala Harris’ Past Immigration Policies Stir Debate

Yellow immigration sign with arrow pointing right.

Vice President Kamala Harris’s stance on immigration has shifted dramatically, leaving supporters and critics alike questioning her true position.

At a Glance

Harris has moved from a progressive stance to a more centrist position on immigration
She now supports a bipartisan border security bill that includes funding for border wall construction
The Biden administration has seen a decrease in migration numbers following stricter asylum rules
Harris’s current approach aims to balance tough immigration policies with her past progressive stances
Pro-immigrant advocates are prioritizing electoral victory over immediate policy disagreements

A Shifting Stance on Immigration

Vice President Kamala Harris, once known for her progressive views on immigration, has undergone a notable transformation in her approach to this contentious issue. As the Biden administration grapples with border security and immigration reform, Harris finds herself at the center of a policy shift that has surprised many of her supporters and critics alike.

Harris’s evolving position is evident in her support for a bipartisan border security bill that includes funding for border wall construction. This marks a significant departure from her previous stance, which was more aligned with progressive immigration reform ideals. The Democratic Party’s platform now includes tougher stances on asylum and deportation, reflecting a broader shift within the party.

Impact of Biden Administration Policies

The Biden administration’s efforts to address immigration concerns have shown some results. A June executive order imposing stricter asylum rules has led to a decrease in migration numbers. U.S. Customs and Border Protection reported about 58,000 encounters in August, down 68% from the same month in 2023. Total encounters at the U.S.-Mexico border in August were 107,503, a 54% decrease from the previous year.

“Yes, there is a palpable and deep worry about how much Democrats are willing to compromise on immigration,” Vanessa Cárdenas, the executive director of the pro-immigration reform group America’s Voice said. “We’re in a very different political moment than years past. We’re going to have to make hard choices. But ultimately as advocates, we need to keep our eye on the ball and make sure we win as much as possible.”

While these numbers suggest a tightening of border control, the administration has also implemented programs to facilitate lawful entry. The “Humanitarian Parole” program for citizens of Cuba, Haiti, Nicaragua, and Venezuela has allowed nearly 530,000 individuals to arrive legally since January 2023.

Balancing Act: Progressive Past and Current Realities

Harris’s current approach to immigration represents a delicate balancing act between her past progressive stances and the realities of governing. This shift is evident in her public statements, which have become more focused on border security and deterrence.

This statement, made during a visit to Guatemala in June 2021, marked a significant departure from her previous, more welcoming stance on immigration. It reflects the administration’s efforts to address both humanitarian concerns and border security issues simultaneously.

Looking Ahead: Challenges and Opportunities

As the 2024 election approaches, Harris and the Democratic Party face the challenge of maintaining their base’s support while addressing broader concerns about border security. Pro-immigrant advocates are prioritizing electoral victory over immediate policy disagreements, recognizing the high stakes of the upcoming election.

“Right now, the assignment is very clear,” Cárdenas said. “We have to make sure that Trump is defeated, and in February 2025, we can have a conversation about what kind of reforms we need to make.”

The coming months will likely see continued debate and scrutiny of Harris’s stance on immigration. As she navigates this complex issue, her ability to balance security concerns with humanitarian considerations will be crucial in shaping both her political future and the Democratic Party’s approach to immigration reform.